Implemented EOS, Agile, or a New Leadership Program? Is Anyone Still Using It?
Published data puts EOS's own success rate at under 30% reaching full traction within 18 months. We see the same pattern in Agile rollouts and leadership programs that launch well and are never checked on again.
Welcome to The Cyr Method
In our experience, the framework is rarely the problem. What erodes is discipline and mindset.
Meeting cadence starts to slip
A meeting that still happens on schedule, but turns into venting instead of decisions with an owner and a date
A sprint board, scorecard or work tracker nobody has opened in months
Missed commitments that get pushed to "next quarter" without anyone saying why
The same problem is getting raised every meeting with no resolution
You paid real money for this. Months later, is it still running, or did it get shelved?
Why We Do This
We've watched good frameworks fall apart, not because they were wrong, but because nobody was ever assigned to check if the discipline behind them was still there. The people usually did nothing wrong. They just weren't given anything to be honest against. We built this because that gap deserves a straight answer, not another framework.
How We Work
Audit, Adopt, Renew.
An independent audit of your operating system, EOS, Agile, a leadership program, or something built in-house, for teams across Halifax and Canada.
The Audit
Confidential interviews across your team, a review of what's actually being used, and time in your real meetings. You get a written report on what's working, what's stalled, and what to do next. In person and remote.
What people say about Mishkin
Every Engagement Starts the Same Way
We audit first. We find out what's actually happening, not the polished summary.
We build a plan. A path based on exactly what the audit finds, not a generic script.
We start with one fix. The highest-leverage engagement, to prove it lands before going deeper.
Usually invoiced after delivery. Paid for work that made a difference.

